Reflection as a Project Manage for Gibbs Reflective- MyAssignmenthelp

Question: Discuss about theReflection as a Project Manage for Gibbs Reflective. Answer: Gibbs reflective cycle usually consists of six important steps. The first step is called the description phase. In this phase, the main incident is described. It was seen that although huge number of training programs were conducted, however the nurses were not being able to provide the best care to the patients (Nicoloni et al., 2014). When one individual nurse maintained proper hygiene with the maintenance of skin care of the face, she failed in the task of proper choosing of the masks. The other nurse had an exactly opposite issue. The other issue faced by another nurse is with the proper technique of dressing. It was very difficult to understand that in spite of an arrangement of training issues, the problem could not be solved entirely. The second step is mainly the description of the feeling that the individual developed after the incidence (Boroughs, 2017). In spite of trying very hard to reach the main reason, I completely failed and could not understand where the main issue lay within the nurses. Moreover, I also felt disappointed as such a planned project was not bringing sufficient results. The third step was evaluation phase. After the experience, I understood that the project I had planned was lacking some important aspects which I was not being able to understand. I realized that the practice of the nurses needs to develop in order to attain the best care. I also evaluated that I was missing out on an important aspect which needs to be incorporated to make the project successful. Analysis part is the fourth step. In this step, while analyzing the issue I understood that although I had implemented a training program but I never inquired the individual issues faced by a particular nurse. The training program only provided a lecture for the nurses but failed to conduct practical training sessions under experienced nurses who would guide them in practical in the real situation. Practical sessions have important contributions in the development of the working styles as well as the skills and knowledge about the different procedures that the nurse should follow. Although lecture classes gives an entire detailed idea about how to develop skills in order to mitigate the issues faced during handling of the pressure but it can never ascertain the difficulty level that may be faced by nurses. It is only during the practical sessions, that the nurse can realize their own weak points and try to recover them with development of effective skills. As I had not included the p art, the nurse did not realize their weaknesses. Therefore when they attended the real situation, they started facing issues of various kinds and therefore in spite of so many initiatives the project could not achieve full success. Moreover, I also understood that my project should have included a proper evaluation program for the first there months after implementation in order to understand the main issues faced by nurses. Implementation plan should always be followed by a proper evaluation plan that should have a definite framework. A proper committee should always be established who have the expertise to understand the negative aspects that are resulting from the implementation strategies that have been produced. Each and every member of the evaluation board should be inspecting each of the aims and objectives that have been prepared at the beginning of the project. A consort or a checklist should be maintained for each of the healthcare professionals so that the experts can und erstand that whether each working individual are successful in completing the goals of the project. If the evaluation board would have been established, the different negative effects would have been easily identified by the experts at the implementation level only. Immediately corrections would have been done in the activities of the nurse which would have helped in achieving the result much more quickly than it took place after several issues were identified when nurses hit the work floor after training. The next step is the conclusion part. After analyzing the main issue, I reached a conclusion that I have not properly been able to include all the important aspects that were necessary for the project (Crimi et al., 2016). I should have inquired the nurses about the different issues they face in the respiratory ward and then plan the interventions accordingly. Moreover, the training class that has been conducted was devoid of practical sessions and did not cover the any evaluation of the nurses performance. Therefore all the attributes should be included in order to make the project successful. This showed me that I still lack certain skills in effective planning of a project. While planning a project, I fail to assimilate the correct methods of evaluation that is a must to ensure whether the implementation strategies are successful or not. Hence, it can be concluded, that of proper practical classes were conducted for the nurses and if proper evaluation of the strategies implemented would have considered, the project would have been much more successful without having any negative aspects. The last and final step is the step where the action plan is prepared, so that the issue which was not solved can be handled in a better way. The first plan that should be prepared is to inquire the different nurses with a proper survey in order to recognize the lack of skill and ability of the nurse rather than planning a common training for all. According to that, they should be allocated to specific teams of senior nurses to work under their guidance (Olivieri et al., 2015). Secondly, I should also establish a monitoring body that will evaluate the performance and report accordingly for modification. Proper practical sessions would be conducted in order to make the nurses develop their skill which they lack and make them practice time and gain so that they never become responsible for the death of any patient. The monitoring body will be composed of eminent professionals who are well equipped with the systems and the process and have strict monitoring over every aspects of the pro ject. They will monitor the performances and jot down both the negative as well as the positive aspects of the nurses and other staffs. I will arrange for an open discussion sessions, where both the positive as well as the negative aspects will be discussed for improvement as well as to gain confidence by everyone. I have failed to provide a proper implementation plan by incorporating all the team members. Although I included the nursing leader, project heads and the senior nurses, I failed to incorporate the registered as well as enrolled nurses. I should have included all the team members giving them the scope of providing feedback and also inquiring about their issues. Feedback receiving skills should be incorporated in my team work management attributes which will ultimately make me better as a team leader or the head of a project. Moreover, while developing a plan of the project, I should always follow a proper framework that would constitute research, monitoring, plan development, cross checking of resources, inquiry about the issues, implementation plan and then proper evaluation of the implemented plan. Evaluation part is very important in order to understand whether the plan that has been conducted is successful or not. Therefore, critical analyzing skill to develop an idea about what important factors need to be incorporated and what factors should be neglected is very important in order for correct allocation of resources (Sorenson et al., 2013). Therefore, correct analyzing skill is also important to act as a successful project manager in the healthcare sectors. I realized that I have to develop my communication skills and be a good listener. Cutting them while a colleague or a junior is discussing a point should be stopped by me and I should allow them to completely open up their emotions and feedbacks without judging them beforehand. I should work over my non verbal communication approached like building of proper body language, eye contact, hand gestures and others so that my approach does not seem rude or impolite. Maintaining clarity and concision is very important along with being friendly with my colleagues as well as my juniors. I already empathize with my workers for which they respect me a lot. However, I should try to be more open minded while communicating so that the opposite persons feel relaxed and discuss issues in details. From the unsuccessful results of the project that I conducted, I realized that I have to develop my organizational skills to achieve 100% success. I have to develop my knowledge in general organizing of the projects, proper planning, time management, scheduling, coordinating resources and meeting of different deadlines. I already have gained insights into the mentioned skills; however, I have to develop more knowledge in implementation and evaluation skills in order to assure success of the projects. I noticed that I have a number of flaws in my leadership skills. The fist flaw is that I do not have communication skills required to communicate with juniors and the workers. I also failed to motivate them as I was not able to understand the main issues faced by the nurses. However as a good leader, I tried to maintain positivity and harmony within the groups and a s a result, no internal conflicts arose. I tried to be creative in my approach and tended to incorporate easier training methods. However although I maintained all the fundamental duties with responsibility as a leader, I failed to seek for feedback from my workers which impacted on the result of the project. From the handling of the project, I realized that I practice empathy with my workers and due to my well applied emotional intelligence in my working environment; the workers are happy and contempt and try to work better. However, I lack feedback receiving skill while communicating with the nurses and as a result; they could not discuss the arenas where they were facing issues. Although my planning for the project was detailed with proper resource management, scheduling and others, I failed to incorporate a proper evaluation framework. Therefore form next time; I will develop my listening and feedback receiving skills and be open minded allowing both positivity and criticisms from my fellow workers. This will help me in finding faults in my work and developing the quality of my work. References: Boroughs, D. S. (2017). An Evaluation of a Continuing Education Program for Family Caregivers of Ventilator-Dependent Children with Spinal Muscular Atrophy (SMA).Children,4(5), 33. Crimi, C., Noto, A., Princi, P., Cuvelier, A., Masa, J. F., Simonds, A., ... Nava, S. (2016). Domiciliary Non-invasive Ventilation in COPD: An International Survey of Indications and Practices.COPD: Journal of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease,13(4), 483-490. Nicolini, A., Ferraioli, G., Ferrari?Bravo, M., Barlascini, C., Santo, M., Ferrera, L. (2014). Early non?invasive ventilation treatment for respiratory failure due to severe community?acquired pneumonia.The clinical respiratory journal. Olivieri, C., Carenzo, L., Vignazia, G. L., Campanini, M., Pirisi, M., Della Corte, F., Navalesi, P. (2015). Does noninvasive ventilation delivery in the ward provide early effective ventilation?.Respiratory care,60(1), 6-11. Srensen, D., Frederiksen, K., Grfte, T., Lomborg, K. (2013). Practical wisdom: A qualitative study of the care and management of non-invasive ventilation patients by experienced intensive care nurses.Intensive and Critical Care Nursing,29(3), 174-181.